Trump’s Bold Venezuela Move: Six Nations Outraged

(LibertyInsiderNews.com) – A joint communiqué from six nations challenges US actions in Venezuela, spotlighting sovereignty issues and oil interests.

Story Highlights

Six nations condemn US military actions in Venezuela.
Concerns over sovereignty and resource control are raised.
Latin America positioned as a “Zone of Peace.”

US Military Action in Venezuela Sparks International Dispute

On January 4, 2026, Spain, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Uruguay issued a joint statement condemning a US military operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. This operation, ordered by President Donald Trump, has been criticized as a breach of international law and an attempt to exploit Venezuela’s rich oil reserves. The signatory nations assert that such unilateral actions threaten regional peace and demand immediate UN involvement.

The joint communiqué emphasizes the importance of respecting Venezuela’s sovereignty and rejects any form of external control or resource appropriation. This reaction unites ideologically diverse nations, bridging the political spectrum from Brazil’s left-leaning government to Chile’s right-leaning administration. The statement calls for dialogue and a peaceful resolution, underscoring Latin America and the Caribbean as a “Zone of Peace.”

Background and Historical Context

The Venezuelan crisis has been ongoing since Nicolás Maduro’s controversial re-election in 2018, which led to US sanctions and the recognition of opposition leader Juan Guaidó as interim president in 2019. The situation has deteriorated into economic collapse and mass migration. This recent US military intervention under Trump has revived tensions reminiscent of the Monroe Doctrine era, significantly impacting the region’s stability.

Latin American nations have historically opposed external interventions, drawing parallels to the US invasion of Panama in 1989. Unlike past incidents, the current situation sees a unified regional response, with countries from both ends of the political spectrum rallying against US actions. The joint statement invokes the UN Charter’s prohibitions and highlights the need for a Venezuelan-led solution.

Implications and Expert Perspectives

The short-term implications of this situation include heightened tensions and potential UN mediation. In the long term, it sets a precedent against foreign interventions and stresses the importance of non-intervention norms. The economic impact is significant, with the threat of resource appropriation disrupting oil markets and broader regional stability.

Experts note the rarity and significance of this joint statement, which unites diverse governments and challenges US dominance in the region. Analysts interpret it as a backlash against Trump’s unilateralism, emphasizing the need for diplomatic solutions and regional sovereignty. This stance strengthens multipolarity, with Russia and China supporting Maduro and criticizing US actions.